“All the Skies That Are Fit to Print”
Five Federal Bureau of Investigation field agents were conducting a routine 2023 operation when a glowing orb appeared on the horizon. One agent turned to his partner and asked the question that has been asked by witnesses for decades — and their accounts are now part of the official U.S. government UAP record.
There is a moment that appears in UAP witness accounts with striking regularity, across decades, across cultures, across professions. It is the moment when a trained observer — a pilot, a military officer, a police officer — sees something in the sky that does not fit any category they possess, turns to whoever is standing next to them, and asks a version of the same question. Do you see that? Are you getting this? Are you seeing this? The question is not rhetorical. It is a person reaching, instinctively, for corroboration — because what they are seeing is so outside their framework that they need a second pair of eyes to confirm it is real.
That moment happened in 2023, during a federal law enforcement field operation, to an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. He turned to his partner and said: “Are you seeing this?” A glowing orb had lit up the sky.
The account, along with those of four other FBI agents who witnessed anomalous aerial objects during the same or closely related operation, was included in the Pentagon’s third batch of declassified UAP files, released on June 12, 2026. It marks the first time that Federal Bureau of Investigation field agents have appeared as named institutional witnesses in an official U.S. government UAP document release. That is not a minor development. It is a significant expansion of the evidentiary base of the modern UAP record.
The documents released by the Pentagon describe five FBI field agents observing strange orbs on the horizon during a 2023 operation. The release does not identify the location, the nature of the operation, the specific date, or the names of the agents involved — standard practice for accounts that intersect with active law enforcement activities or classified programme areas.
What the documents do describe is the character of the observation: glowing objects, anomalous behaviour, multiple independent witnesses present simultaneously. The account was considered credible enough to be formally submitted to AARO — the Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office — and credible enough to be included in a public release of official government documents. These are not thresholds that are easily crossed. The FBI does not file reports carelessly, and the Pentagon does not include accounts in public UAP releases without review.
The verbatim quote — “Are you seeing this?” — is included in the documents. It is the kind of detail that official reports rarely contain, and its inclusion suggests that the reporting agent considered the spontaneous reaction of his colleague to be material to the account — evidence that the sighting was genuinely surprising to trained observers in the moment, not retrospectively constructed.
The UAP witness record has always been heavily weighted toward military and aviation personnel — Navy pilots, Air Force radar operators, commercial airline crews. These are credible witnesses for specific reasons: they are trained observers, they operate in environments where accurate identification of aerial objects is a professional requirement, and they have institutional accountability for what they report.
FBI field agents bring a different but equally significant form of credibility. They are investigators by profession — people whose entire career is built on the careful observation, documentation, and critical assessment of evidence. They are trained to distinguish what they actually saw from what they assumed or inferred. They work in teams, providing built-in corroboration. And they operate under institutional cultures where professional reputation is closely tied to the reliability of reported observations. An FBI agent who files an inaccurate report faces consequences that are not abstract.
The inclusion of FBI witness accounts in the official UAP record therefore matters in a way that goes beyond the specific details of any single sighting. It means that the population of institutional witnesses to UAP phenomena — people whose professional context makes their accounts harder to dismiss than those of ordinary civilians — now includes not just military and aviation professionals, but federal law enforcement officers. The institutional web of the UAP record is widening.
The specific phenomenon the FBI agents reported — glowing orbs on the horizon — is not new in the UAP record. It is, in fact, the single most consistent category of reported UAP across all sources and time periods. Orbs appear in military radar data, in Navy FLIR footage, in the accounts of airline pilots, in the Pentagon’s previous document releases, and in thousands of civilian sighting reports filed with organisations like MUFON over the past several decades.
The third Pentagon release also includes accounts of glowing red and white orbs over the northeastern United States, an orange “mother orb” observed releasing smaller red orbs near a sensitive military installation in Colorado, and objects that appeared to split into smaller objects during observation. These are not isolated reports from the fringes of the UAP research community. They are accounts that have passed through the filter of official government documentation and been deemed credible enough for public release.
What the orb pattern suggests — and this remains a suggestion, not a conclusion — is that whatever is being observed in these accounts has consistent physical characteristics across very different observers, in very different locations, over a very long period of time. That consistency is itself a datum. It does not tell us what the objects are. But it tells us that something is being observed repeatedly, by credible witnesses, that does not fit the catalogue of known aerial phenomena.
The phrase “Are you seeing this?” deserves a moment of attention beyond its evidential function. It is a human response to a genuinely disorienting experience — the experience of seeing something that does not fit the world as you understand it, and reaching immediately for another person to share the weight of it.
Pilots have said versions of it. Astronauts have said versions of it. Police officers, soldiers, and farmers have said versions of it. It is the universal first response to a UAP encounter, and it appears in the record with a consistency that is itself revealing. The question is not asked when someone sees a plane, or a drone, or a weather balloon. It is asked when someone sees something they cannot categorise — something that sits outside the boundary of their professional training and their personal experience of the world.
Five FBI agents asked that question, or heard it asked, in 2023. Their accounts are now official. Whatever else remains uncertain about what they saw — and much does — the fact that they saw it, reported it, and were believed by the institutions they work within is no longer in doubt.
Browse More: Military & Law Enforcement UFO Witness Books
Pilot, military and federal agent accounts
Browse on Amazon →Related: Pentagon Third Batch: All the Cases · The FBI and UFOs: A Declassified History · The Nimitz Encounter · Ryan Graves: What Navy Pilots Actually Saw