The Hypogeum of Malta: What Happened to Its Mysterious Elongated Skulls?

Beneath Paola, Malta, a 6,000-year-old underground sanctuary holds a vast quantity of prehistoric human bone — and a handful of long-headed skulls that have fuelled decades of extraterrestrial speculation. We examine what was actually found, what the original publication says, and what the claims rest on.

By Rachid Alahly  ·  August 20, 2026  ·  Ancient Mysteries / Archaeology

A Prehistoric Sanctuary Cut from Rock

The Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum — the name derives from Greek, meaning “underground chamber” — is unlike anything else in European prehistory. Carved over at least fifteen centuries from the soft globigerina limestone beneath the town of Paola in southern Malta, it descends through three levels to a depth of roughly ten metres. Its chambers, niches, and passages were shaped with stone tools alone, and their walls bear traces of the red ochre spiral paintings that also decorate Malta’s above-ground megalithic temples.

The site was used primarily as a communal burial place. The excavated deposits contained a vast quantity of commingled human bone. In 1910, Themistocles Zammit offered a very approximate estimate that the material represented a minimum of roughly 6,000–7,000 people. This was not a count of separately identified skeletons, and UNESCO, following the excavation literature, describes the site as containing the remains of approximately 7,000 individuals — a figure that should be understood as an estimate rather than a precise archaeological count.

On current dating, the complex was in use during the Maltese Neolithic — approximately 4000 to 2500 BCE — encompassing the Ġgantija phase, the Saflieni phase, and the Tarxien phase that represents the height of Malta’s prehistoric temple civilisation. UNESCO inscribed the Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum as a World Heritage Site in 1980. It remains one of the best-preserved prehistoric underground monuments in the world.

What makes the Hypogeum particularly unusual — even by the standards of prehistoric Europe — is the architectural sophistication of its principal chambers. The second level contains spaces that reproduce, in carved stone, the corbelled ceilings, trilithon doorways, and horizontal beam details found in Malta’s above-ground temples. These features were not structural necessities underground; they appear to have been deliberate aesthetic and symbolic choices, suggesting that the people who built this complex understood architectural space in ways we can observe but not fully interpret.

The Discovery and Excavation

In 1902, workers drilling a cistern for a new housing development in Paola broke through the roof of an underground chamber. The discovery was initially kept quiet by the property owner. Word eventually reached the colonial authorities, and formal excavation began in 1903 under the direction of Father Emmanuel Magri, a Jesuit priest with archaeological training.

Following Magri’s death in Tunisia in 1907 — and the loss of his excavation notes — Themistocles Zammit assumed responsibility for the work. Zammit, then director of the Malta Museum and the island’s first professionally trained archaeologist, continued the investigation methodically until 1911, recording the architecture, documenting the find contexts, and cataloguing the human remains and associated objects. The loss of Magri’s notes means that the documentation for the earliest phase of excavation is incomplete.

What Was Found Inside

The vast quantity of commingled human bone recovered from the three levels indicates that the Hypogeum served a funerary function over many generations — likely for a sizeable community and possibly for people of specific social status, given the architectural elaboration of the principal chambers. The approximate scale of the deposit is what prompted Zammit’s estimate of 6,000–7,000 minimum individuals; the precise tally cannot be recovered from commingled, disarticulated remains.

Associated finds included pottery in styles consistent with the Saflieni and Tarxien phases, bone and shell ornaments, small animal figurines, and at least one object that has become one of Malta’s most recognisable prehistoric artefacts: the Sleeping Lady. This small terracotta figure, dated to around 3000 BCE, depicts a reclining form on what appears to be a couch or bed. The pose has been interpreted as representing ritual sleep, incubation dreaming, or death — practices associated with healing sanctuaries in the ancient Mediterranean. Its precise findspot within the Hypogeum was not recorded in detail by the early excavators, limiting interpretive conclusions. It is now housed at the National Museum of Archaeology in Valletta.

The Hypogeum’s walls retain traces of red ochre decoration, most prominently spirals and honeycomb patterns. Red ochre decoration is a recurring feature of Maltese prehistoric sites and may carry symbolic significance related to blood, fertility, or ritual. In the Hypogeum context, where the dead were interred, the meaning is uncertain. The decoration is damaged and fragmentary, and its original extent is not fully known.

The Skulls: What the 1912 Publication Actually Says

In 1912, Temi Zammit, Eric T. Peet and R.N. Bradley published The Small Objects and the Human Skulls Found in the Hal-Saflieni Prehistoric Hypogeum at Casal Paula, Malta. The text is available via the University of Malta’s Open Access Repository at um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/9125. This is the primary documentary source for what was actually observed about the skulls recovered from the Hypogeum.

The 1912 publication examined 11 measurable skulls from the site. Of these, several were classified as dolichocephalic — that is, having a cephalic index below 75, meaning the skull is notably longer front-to-back than it is wide. Dolichocephaly is a well-attested natural anatomical variation. It is recorded in Neolithic and Bronze Age populations across the Mediterranean and is not regarded by physical anthropologists as evidence of a distinct species, an unusual population origin, or any non-human characteristic.

The classification of a skull as dolichocephalic means its length-to-breadth ratio falls in a specific range. It does not mean the skull is large, alien, or anatomically anomalous. Dolichocephalic individuals have lived on Malta and across the Mediterranean throughout prehistory and recorded history.

What the 1912 publication does not describe: skulls lacking cranial sutures, skulls of nonhuman proportions, skulls whose volume exceeds the human range, skulls attributed to an extraterrestrial population, or thousands of skulls with unusual morphology. These descriptions appear in internet sources and alternative history videos, not in the original documentation.

Anatomising the Claims

The most widely circulated claims about the Hypogeum skulls can be assessed directly against the primary sources.

Claim: Thousands of elongated skulls were discovered. The 1912 publication examined 11 measurable skulls. The broader skeletal deposit was not the subject of a comprehensive cranial morphology study, and no subsequent peer-reviewed analysis has reported a figure of “thousands” of elongated skulls. The characterisation of the entire assemblage as composed of elongated skulls has no documented basis.

Claim: The skulls lack a parietal plate or cranial sutures. Absent cranial sutures — specifically the absence of the sagittal or coronal sutures — would be a genuine anatomical anomaly. This claim does not appear in the 1912 Zammit, Peet and Bradley publication, nor in any subsequent peer-reviewed anatomical study of the Hypogeum material. The claim is consistently associated in internet sources with the Paracas skulls from Peru — a different archaeological collection on a different continent — and appears to have been applied to the Malta material without a traceable primary source.

Claim: The skulls disappeared or were removed from public view. Heritage Malta has stated that the skulls were held in its reserve collection and had not been publicly exhibited since 1995. The institution opened the exhibition Alien Headaches? The Hypogeum Skulls Enigma in December 2020, and the display continued into 2021. The skulls did not disappear; they were in institutional storage between public exhibitions, which is standard archival practice for fragile archaeological material.

Claim: The skulls are extraterrestrial or represent a separate nonhuman species. No physical anthropologist, anatomist, or archaeologist who has examined the Hypogeum skeletal material has described the remains as nonhuman. The dolichocephalic skulls documented in 1912 are within the range of natural human anatomical variation. The extraterrestrial interpretation does not derive from the excavation literature or from subsequent scientific analysis of the material.

The Oracle Chamber: Sound, Resonance and What the Research Found

Among the Hypogeum’s chambers, the Oracle Room on the second level has attracted particular scientific interest for a reason that is real, documented, and genuinely unusual: its acoustic properties.

The most rigorous peer-reviewed investigation of the Hypogeum’s acoustics was conducted by Rupert Till of the University of Huddersfield and published in Antiquity in 2017 (DOI: 10.15184/aqy.2016.258). Till’s systematic measurements identified primary resonances in the Oracle Chamber at approximately 41, 72 and 76 Hz — frequencies in the lower end of the acoustic range. An earlier, more limited study by Debertolis and colleagues had reported responses around 114 Hz and 68–70 Hz, but Till identified methodological limitations in that experiment.

The Oracle Room also features a small aperture cut into the wall. Whether this aperture was intentionally positioned for acoustic effect, or whether it served another function, cannot be determined from the physical evidence alone.

The acoustic resonances documented by Till are a real and scientifically measurable property of the chamber. Whether they were intentionally designed, whether prehistoric users perceived them as significant, and whether they influenced ritual behaviour are separate questions that the acoustic data alone cannot answer.

What acoustic research does not establish: that the builders consciously engineered the Oracle Room as an acoustic instrument, that the resonances were intended to alter consciousness, that any acoustic frequency at this site has genetic or DNA-level effects on those present, or that the properties require an explanation beyond the natural behaviour of the limestone in which the chamber is carved. These are interpretations imposed on the acoustic data, not conclusions that follow from it.

What the Evidence Actually Supports

The Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum is one of the most remarkable prehistoric monuments in the world. Its construction — carried out over many generations with stone, bone, and antler tools in a soft but demanding limestone — required significant organisational capacity, architectural knowledge, and sustained communal investment. The people who built it were not primitive. They were the same civilisation that constructed the Ġgantija temples on Gozo, currently the oldest free-standing stone structures on Earth, and the Tarxien temples of Malta, with their elaborate spiral carvings and altar niches.

The Hypogeum is consistent, in every documented feature, with the funerary and ritual practices of Malta’s Neolithic temple builders. The dolichocephalic skulls fall within the natural range of human anatomical variation. The acoustic properties of the Oracle Chamber are real and peer-reviewed, but they do not require a supernatural or extraterrestrial explanation. The Sleeping Lady is a sophisticated and moving object, but she is consistent in material, style, and context with other Neolithic Maltese figurines.

The Hypogeum’s real mystery is not extraterrestrial. It is the mystery of a sophisticated civilisation that flourished on a small island for over a thousand years, built monuments of remarkable technical and aesthetic accomplishment, and then — around 2500 BCE, for reasons that remain unclear — appears to have collapsed or disappeared. The people who used the Hypogeum left no written records. What they believed, how they organised themselves, and why their civilisation ended are questions the archaeology raises but cannot fully answer.

That is a genuine and profound historical mystery. It does not require skulls without sutures or alien architects to be worth taking seriously.

Evidence Assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources and Further Reading

Further Reading

ⓘ Affiliate disclosure: The UFO Times participates in the Amazon Associates programme and earns commissions on qualifying purchases. Our editorial positions are independent of affiliate relationships.